Plagiarism Policy

Frontiers in Interdisciplinary Applied Science

1. Introduction

Frontiers in Interdisciplinary Applied Science (FIAS) is dedicated to upholding the highest standards of academic integrity. This Plagiarism Policy outlines the procedures for handling allegations of plagiarism and ensuring that all published research is original and properly cited.

2. Definition of Plagiarism

Plagiarism is defined as the use of someone else's work, ideas, or expressions without proper acknowledgment, presenting them as one’s own. This includes, but is not limited to:

  • Direct Plagiarism: Copying text verbatim from a source without quotation marks or proper citation.
  • Self-Plagiarism: Reusing significant portions of one’s own previously published work without proper citation or disclosure.
  • Mosaic Plagiarism: Incorporating phrases or ideas from a source into one’s own work without proper citation.
  • Accidental Plagiarism: Failing to properly attribute sources due to oversight or misunderstanding of citation rules.

3. Detection of Plagiarism

FIAS employs various tools and procedures to detect potential plagiarism, including:

  • Plagiarism Detection Software: Manuscripts are screened using plagiarism detection tools to identify similarities with previously published works.
  • Editorial Review: The editorial team and reviewers are trained to recognize signs of plagiarism and inconsistencies in manuscripts.

4. Procedures for Handling Plagiarism

4.1. Initial Review

If plagiarism is suspected, the editorial team will conduct an initial review to assess the nature and extent of the issue. This may involve:

  • Comparing the suspected text with the original sources.
  • Consulting with experts or external reviewers if necessary.

4.2. Notification and Investigation

  • Notification: If plagiarism is confirmed or appears likely, the corresponding author will be notified and asked to provide an explanation.
  • Investigation: The editorial team will investigate the matter thoroughly. This may involve gathering evidence, consulting with the author, and reviewing the manuscript’s history.

4.3. Decision and Actions

Depending on the findings, the following actions may be taken:

  • No Action: If the evidence does not support the allegation, the manuscript will proceed as normal.
  • Revisions: If minor issues are identified, the author may be asked to make corrections and properly cite sources.
  • Rejection: If significant plagiarism is confirmed, the manuscript will be rejected, and the authors will be informed of the reasons.
  • Retraction: If plagiarism is discovered after publication, a retraction notice will be issued, and the article will be removed from the journal’s archive.
  • Reporting: In cases of severe or repeated plagiarism, the authors may be reported to their affiliated institutions or relevant academic bodies.

5. Author Responsibilities

Authors are responsible for:

  • Ensuring that all sources are properly cited and attributed in their manuscripts.
  • Familiarizing themselves with and adhering to the journal’s guidelines for citation and originality.
  • Providing accurate and honest representations of their work.

6. Confidentiality

All investigations and communications regarding plagiarism allegations will be conducted with strict confidentiality. The privacy of all parties involved will be protected throughout the process.

7. Appeals Process

Authors who disagree with the decision regarding plagiarism allegations may appeal the decision by:

  • Submitting a formal appeal to the editorial office, including supporting evidence and a detailed explanation.
  • The appeal will be reviewed by the editorial board or a designated appeals committee, and a final decision will be communicated to the author.

8. Continuous Improvement

FIAS is committed to continually improving its plagiarism detection and handling procedures. Feedback from authors, reviewers, and readers is welcomed to enhance the effectiveness of this policy.